Talk:Project management suggestions

Ratings

Proleric1 13:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) The NWVault rating system is good, but any competent statistician will tell you that the sample size is far too small to make detailed judgements on the results. So, anything voted 9+ is probably good - a very useful thing to know - but being #1 in the rankings rather than #10 is probably meaningless. I'm not sure what the latest research says about these things, but I suspect a slightly simpler system would be better - for example, a scale 1-10 (with no .25 intervals) and no guidelines on what the scores mean. NWVault calculates the average ranking by a complicated algorithm, which is open to troll voting. IMO it would be fairer to rank on the median score. It's useful to see a histogram of the scores, too, e.g. http://proleric.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=39&start=0&view=viewpoll. Some people dismiss the voting system as a measure of how many friends you have, but I think that's too cynical - as long as you just see it as a way of sorting sheep from goats, and nothing more.

--E.C.Patterson 23:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Agreed.

Why is this on the discussion page and not the suggestion page? Meseems it is a relevant point of consideration. Snoteye 10:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Proleric1 Good point. I've promoted it to the suggestion page.

Thanks. I would have probably picked the stuff on the talk page up too, but this makes it more certain. :) BryanDerksen 17:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Captchas (removal of)

Proleric1 14:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC) Proleric approves +10