Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chargenmorphcfg.xml"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Where anyone thinks mods should go is irrelevant (not to mention debatable in the first place). The simple fact is that the overwhelming majority of mods utilise the Override folder and will continue to do so, therefore there will be conflicts in cases where chargenmorphcfg.xml is utilised. There's no point just telling people to make Addins. [[User:DarthParametric|DarthParametric]] 17:40, 23 December 2010 | Where anyone thinks mods should go is irrelevant (not to mention debatable in the first place). The simple fact is that the overwhelming majority of mods utilise the Override folder and will continue to do so, therefore there will be conflicts in cases where chargenmorphcfg.xml is utilised. There's no point just telling people to make Addins. [[User:DarthParametric|DarthParametric]] 17:40, 23 December 2010 | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'd be interested to hear why you think the use of the folders which the toolset uses by default is questionable. Isn't this largely a matter of evidence rather than opinion? What the majority do doesn't seem important to me. For example, if it turned out that most mods have shoddy content, we wouldn't want the wiki to encourage that, would we? [[User:Proleric1|Proleric1]] 06:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:52, 24 December 2010
The mod conflicts section appears to assume that mods should go in packages override. Is that a technical requirement here? See Compatibility page for a discussion of this issue Proleric1 09:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Where anyone thinks mods should go is irrelevant (not to mention debatable in the first place). The simple fact is that the overwhelming majority of mods utilise the Override folder and will continue to do so, therefore there will be conflicts in cases where chargenmorphcfg.xml is utilised. There's no point just telling people to make Addins. DarthParametric 17:40, 23 December 2010
I'd be interested to hear why you think the use of the folders which the toolset uses by default is questionable. Isn't this largely a matter of evidence rather than opinion? What the majority do doesn't seem important to me. For example, if it turned out that most mods have shoddy content, we wouldn't want the wiki to encourage that, would we? Proleric1 06:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
