Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chargenmorphcfg.xml"
From Dragon Age Toolset Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The mod conflicts section appears to assume that mods should go in packages override. Is that a technical requirement here? See Compatibility page for a discussion of this issue [[User:Proleric1|Proleric1]] 09:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | The mod conflicts section appears to assume that mods should go in packages override. Is that a technical requirement here? See Compatibility page for a discussion of this issue [[User:Proleric1|Proleric1]] 09:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | Where anyone thinks mods should go is irrelevant (not to mention debatable in the first place). The simple fact is that the overwhelming majority of mods utilise the Override folder and will continue to do so, therefore there will be conflicts in cases where chargenmorphcfg.xml is utilised. There's no point just telling people to make Addins. | + | Where anyone thinks mods should go is irrelevant (not to mention debatable in the first place). The simple fact is that the overwhelming majority of mods utilise the Override folder and will continue to do so, therefore there will be conflicts in cases where chargenmorphcfg.xml is utilised. There's no point just telling people to make Addins. [User:DarthParametric|DarthParametric]] 17:40, 23 December 2010 |
Revision as of 18:41, 23 December 2010
The mod conflicts section appears to assume that mods should go in packages override. Is that a technical requirement here? See Compatibility page for a discussion of this issue Proleric1 09:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Where anyone thinks mods should go is irrelevant (not to mention debatable in the first place). The simple fact is that the overwhelming majority of mods utilise the Override folder and will continue to do so, therefore there will be conflicts in cases where chargenmorphcfg.xml is utilised. There's no point just telling people to make Addins. [User:DarthParametric|DarthParametric]] 17:40, 23 December 2010
