Difference between revisions of "Talk:Art"

From Dragon Age Toolset Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Suggestion)
m
Line 50: Line 50:
 
----
 
----
 
::Actually it's not: art resources also form the basis of other art resources and designer resources are included in other designer resources. That aside doesn't seem to be any real point to this: it is overly simplistic and yet, with seemingly no rhyme or reason include both custom content and 2da while omitting everything else. However, and hopefully most compelling, given that navigation is already under review why not incorporate these ideas into that review? Global structured solution rather than dislocated piecemeal reaction.
 
::Actually it's not: art resources also form the basis of other art resources and designer resources are included in other designer resources. That aside doesn't seem to be any real point to this: it is overly simplistic and yet, with seemingly no rhyme or reason include both custom content and 2da while omitting everything else. However, and hopefully most compelling, given that navigation is already under review why not incorporate these ideas into that review? Global structured solution rather than dislocated piecemeal reaction.
 +
::--[[User:Sunjammer|Sunjammer]] 01:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:26, 27 January 2010

Maybe need separation between Art and Designer Resources. As well as cleanup the Design Page, which is cluttered with everything.


Would something like this be worth replacing the image in overview? Im not sure if i see it correctly. Eshme 02:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Game
Arrow1.JPG Arrow2.JPG
Designer Resources Design 2DA's
Arrow1.JPG Arrow2.JPG
Art Resources Art 2DA's
Seems reasonably accurate to me. I'll take a stab at redoing the overview graphic tomorrow along these lines. BryanDerksen 01:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Actually it's not: art resources also form the basis of other art resources and designer resources are included in other designer resources. That aside doesn't seem to be any real point to this: it is overly simplistic and yet, with seemingly no rhyme or reason include both custom content and 2da while omitting everything else. However, and hopefully most compelling, given that navigation is already under review why not incorporate these ideas into that review? Global structured solution rather than dislocated piecemeal reaction.
--Sunjammer 01:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)