<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://datoolset.net/mw/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DocMcCoy</id>
		<title>Dragon Age Toolset Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://datoolset.net/mw/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DocMcCoy"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://datoolset.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/DocMcCoy"/>
		<updated>2026-09-07T14:48:32Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.25.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://datoolset.net/mw/index.php?title=Talk:ERF&amp;diff=15983</id>
		<title>Talk:ERF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://datoolset.net/mw/index.php?title=Talk:ERF&amp;diff=15983"/>
				<updated>2011-03-17T01:41:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DocMcCoy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Who in their right mind thinks that brute-forcing the Blowfish encryption will take &amp;quot;no more than 1 minute&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I missing something here? As far as I can see, the checksum is the weakest point there. Still, 2^64 md5sum operations (worst-case) to brute-force the password from its checksum will take ''considerable'' more time than 1000 years, let alone 1 minute. From what I can see using a quick Google search, even using a dedicated FPGA won't get you into a reasonable time span. [[User:DocMcCoy|DocMcCoy]] 03:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: As far as I can tell, scheme 2 blowfish has a huge restriction on what passwords can be (8 digit passwords), this severely limits what possible passwords there are (100000000 AFAIK?). &amp;amp;mdash;[[User:Thought Process|Thought Process]] 00:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Okay, that would indeed move it into the reasonably brute-forcable range. A very peculiar decision by BioWare... [[User:DocMcCoy|DocMcCoy]] 01:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DocMcCoy</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://datoolset.net/mw/index.php?title=Talk:ERF&amp;diff=15980</id>
		<title>Talk:ERF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://datoolset.net/mw/index.php?title=Talk:ERF&amp;diff=15980"/>
				<updated>2011-03-15T03:47:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DocMcCoy: Add comment about the blowfish encryption note&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Who in their right mind thinks that brute-forcing the Blowfish encryption will take &amp;quot;no more than 1 minute&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I missing something here? As far as I can see, the checksum is the weakest point there. Still, 2^64 md5sum operations (worst-case) to brute-force the password from its checksum will take ''considerable'' more time than 1000 years, let alone 1 minute. From what I can see using a quick Google search, even using a dedicated FPGA won't get you into a reasonable time span. [[User:DocMcCoy|DocMcCoy]] 03:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DocMcCoy</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>